Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) - JN0-643 FREE EXAM DUMPS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

R1 and R2 are ASBRs in the same area, each with an equal cost external path to the same external network prefix. R1 advertises an external route into OSPF with a Type 1 metric.
R2 advertises an external route into OSPF with a Type 2 metric.
Which route would be preferred?

You are designing a new enterprise network using EX switches. You are asked to u management. In this scenario which two statements are correct? (Choose two)

-- Exhibit --
[edit]
user@router# run show ospf database external lsa-id 71.23.48.0 extensive
OSPF AS SCOPE link state database
Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len
Extern 71.23.48.0 67.176.255.5 0x80000001 114 0x22 0x171b 36
mask 255.255.248.0
Topology default (ID 0)
TypE. 2, MetriC. 0, Fwd addr: 0.0.0.0, TaG. 0.0.0.0
Aging timer 00:58:06
Installed 00:01:53 ago, expires in 00:58:06, sent 00:01:53 ago
Last changed 00:01:53 ago, Change count: 1
Extern 71.23.48.0 67.176.255.7 0x8000005a 487 0x22 0x587e 36
mask 255.255.248.0
Topology default (ID 0)
TypE. 2, MetriC. 0, Fwd addr: 0.0.0.0, TaG. 0.0.0.0
Aging timer 00:51:52
Installed 00:08:01 ago, expires in 00:51:53, sent 00:07:59 ago
Last changed 2d 19:33:58 ago, Change count: 1
Extern 71.23.48.0 67.176.255.8 0x8000005c 540 0x22 0xf73e 36
mask 255.255.248.0
Topology default (ID 0)
TypE. 1, MetriC. 30, Fwd addr: 0.0.0.0, TaG. 0.0.0.0
Aging timer 00:51:00
Installed 00:08:59 ago, expires in 00:51:00, sent 00:08:59 ago
Last changed 00:08:59 ago, Change count: 3
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
As shown in the exhibit, a router is receiving three external LSAs for the prefix 71.23.48.0.
Which path is preferred?

What is a valid router ID configuration for OSPFv3 in the Junos OS?

Which policy statement will be applied to neighbor 172.16.4.2?

-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, the RPs are set up for anycast. Multicast traffic is currently flowing from the source to the receivers.
Which statement is true when RP2 goes down?

-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the shortest path from R6 to R5?

You configured IPv6 statics routes on the juniper routes and you want to OSPF to propagate these routes throughout your network. Which set of commands will accomplish these tracks?

A network routes IPv4 traffic only. You want to add IPv6 to the network, but you must use a single IGP for both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic.
Which protocol meets this requirement?

-- Exhibit --
user@router> show log ospf
Sep 19 00:22:13.420315 OSPF packet ignoreD. MTU mismatch from 11.0.0.2 on intf ge-
0/0/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:14.475671 OSPF periodic xmit from 14.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 75 area
0 .0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:14.855490 OSPF periodic xmit from 12.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 84 area
0 .0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:14.857304 OSPF packet ignoreD. no matching interface from 12.0.0.1, IFL
85
Sep 19 00:22:17.386726 OSPF packet ignoreD. MTU mismatch from 11.0.0.2 on intf ge-
0 /0/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:20.855690 OSPF packet ignoreD. subnet mismatch from 10.0.0.2 on intf ge-
0 /0/1.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:20.856108 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.0.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-0/0/1.0 IFL 75 area
0 .0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:20.856177 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.0.0.2, area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:20.856229 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
Sep 19 00:22:20.856299 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
Sep 19 00:22:20.856352 dead_ivl 40, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:21.752438 OSPF packet ignoreD. MTU mismatch from 11.0.0.2 on intf ge-
0/0/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:22.013285 OSPF packet ignoreD. area mismatch (0.0.0.1) from 12.0.0.2 on intf ge-0/0/4.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:22.013749 OSPF rcvd Hello 12.0.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-0/0/4.0 IFL 84 area
0.0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:22.013804 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.0.0.2, area 0.0.0.1
Sep 19 00:22:22.013890 checksum 0xd51e, authtype 0
Sep 19 00:22:22.013944 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
Sep 19 00:22:22.014012 dead_ivl 40, DR 12.0.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:22.016909 OSPF packet ignoreD. no matching interface from 12.0.0.2, IFL
85
Sep 19 00:22:22.434956 OSPF hello from 11.0.0.2 (IFL 83, area 0.0.0.0) absorbed
Sep 19 00:22:23.045916 OSPF periodic xmit from 12.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 84 area
0.0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:23.047959 OSPF packet ignoreD. no matching interface from 12.0.0.1, IFL
85
Sep 19 00:22:23.309957 OSPF periodic xmit from 11.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 83 area
0 .0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:23.528614 OSPF periodic xmit from 14.0.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 75 area
0 .0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:25.772835 OSPF packet ignoreD. MTU mismatch from 11.0.0.2 on intf ge-
0 /0/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:29.950015 OSPF hello from 11.0.0.2 (IFL 83, area 0.0.0.0) absorbed
Sep 19 00:22:30.622112 OSPF packet ignoreD. MTU mismatch from 11.0.0.2 on intf ge-
0/0/2.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:30.713279 OSPF packet ignoreD. subnet mismatch from 10.0.0.2 on intf ge-
0 /0/1.0 area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:30.713432 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.0.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-0/0/1.0 IFL 75 area
0 .0.0.0)
Sep 19 00:22:30.713503 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.0.0.2, area 0.0.0.0
Sep 19 00:22:30.713553 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
Sep 19 00:22:30.713622 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x12, prio 128
Sep 19 00:22:30.713677 dead_ivl 40, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, what is preventing the OSPF adjacency on interface ge-0/0/4 from forming?

-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, the 10.100/16 prefix is introduced at autonomous system 1 (AS1) and propagated through to AS3. Router A in AS3 receives two different paths to these prefixes, one through AS2 and the other through AS4. No BGP attributes have been altered.
Which path would router A prefer for the 10.100/16 prefix?

-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
In the exhibit, customers connected to Area 3 must have access to external prefixes received from the data center connected to the router in Area 1. These configurations are currently applied to the routers in Area 1:
{master:0}[edit]
user@Area-1-ABR# show protocols ospf
no-nssa-abr;
area 0.0.0.1 {
nssa;
interface ge-1/1/1.100;
}
{master:0}[edit]
user@Area-1-External# show protocols ospf
area 0.0.0.1 {
stub no-summaries;
interface ge-1/1/1.100;
}
What must you change for these configurations to work?

You are asked to implement a filter-based VLAN assignment. You have created the firewall filter and must apply this filter to the incoming interface.
Where must this filter be applied?

You are attempting to configure an internal BGP peer on a Junos device. However the configuration failed to commit Referring to the exhibit, which two actions would solve this problem? (Choose two)