Exam CAMS Topic 1 Question 434 Discussion
Actual exam question for ACAMS's CAMS exam
Question #: 434
Topic #: 1
Question #: 434
Topic #: 1
Whichsituation involving a vendorpresentsincreased AML and/or sanctions riskto an organization?
Suggested Answer: D Vote an answer
Vendors and third-party relationships pose financial crime risks, particularly when theyoperate in sanctioned jurisdictions. Organizations must ensure thatthey are not directly or indirectly violating economic sanctionswhen engaging with vendors.
* Option D (Correct):If a vendor provides services tosanctioned entities or individuals, an organizationrisks violating OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions laws, potentially leading tofines, legal action, or reputational damage. Engaging in business in asanctioned regionrequires strictdue diligence and licensing.
* Option A (Incorrect):Thepersonal backgroundof an employee isnot relevantunless theycurrently have direct ties to a sanctioned jurisdiction or person.
* Option B (Incorrect):Alack of majority ownershipdoes not automatically indicateAML risk; however, organizations should still assessownership structures for opacity.
* Option C (Incorrect):Privately held companiescan betransparentif theydisclose ownership and operate within compliance standards.
Why This Matters:
Failing toscreen vendors for sanctions riskscan result insevere penalties, reputational harm, and regulatory scrutiny.OFAC (U.S.), EU, and UN sanctions prohibit business transactions with specific countries, entities, and individuals. Organizations mustconduct thorough due diligencetoidentify and mitigate sanctions risks.
Reference:
OFAC Sanctions Guidelines & Compliance Framework
EU Sanctions Regulations
FATF Recommendation 6 (Targeted Financial Sanctions Related to Terrorism & Proliferation)
* Option D (Correct):If a vendor provides services tosanctioned entities or individuals, an organizationrisks violating OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions laws, potentially leading tofines, legal action, or reputational damage. Engaging in business in asanctioned regionrequires strictdue diligence and licensing.
* Option A (Incorrect):Thepersonal backgroundof an employee isnot relevantunless theycurrently have direct ties to a sanctioned jurisdiction or person.
* Option B (Incorrect):Alack of majority ownershipdoes not automatically indicateAML risk; however, organizations should still assessownership structures for opacity.
* Option C (Incorrect):Privately held companiescan betransparentif theydisclose ownership and operate within compliance standards.
Why This Matters:
Failing toscreen vendors for sanctions riskscan result insevere penalties, reputational harm, and regulatory scrutiny.OFAC (U.S.), EU, and UN sanctions prohibit business transactions with specific countries, entities, and individuals. Organizations mustconduct thorough due diligencetoidentify and mitigate sanctions risks.
Reference:
OFAC Sanctions Guidelines & Compliance Framework
EU Sanctions Regulations
FATF Recommendation 6 (Targeted Financial Sanctions Related to Terrorism & Proliferation)
by Joyce at Feb 14, 2026, 11:29 AM
0
0
0
10
Comments
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Report Comment
Commenting
You can sign-up / login (it's free).