Exam CAMS Topic 2 Question 144 Discussion
Actual exam question for ACAMS's CAMS exam
Question #: 144
Topic #: 2
Question #: 144
Topic #: 2
A U.K. real estate agent has three foreign clients interested in purchasing an apartment building, valued at £30 million, in the outskirts of London as an investment property. The clients are not willing to have their names provided to the bank. The clients want to purchase to be made in the names of three private companies for privacy reasons. The plan is to wire the funds into an account held in the name of another private company at a bank in London.
Which red flag should stop the agent from discussing this potential purchase further?
Which red flag should stop the agent from discussing this potential purchase further?
Suggested Answer: C Vote an answer
The clients are not willing to have their names provided to the bank is a red flag that should stop the agent from discussing this potential purchase further, as this could indicate that the clients are trying to evade customer due diligence (CDD) or know your customer (KYC) requirements, or hide their beneficial ownership or source of funds. According to the U.K. Money Laundering Regulations 2017, real estate agents must conduct CDD on their customers and any beneficial owners, and verify their identity and address1. The
U.K. also has a register of people with significant control (PSC) over companies, which requires companies to disclose their beneficial owners2. The use of private companies and wire transfers could also be a sign of layering, a money laundering technique that involves moving funds through multiple accounts or entities to obscure their origin3.
References:
1: U.K. Government, Money Laundering Regulations 2017, Part 2: Customer Due Diligence, Section 5-6 2: U.
K. Government, People with significant control (PSC) register, Overview 3: ACAMS CAMS Certification Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 1: Risks and Methods of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, Page
19
U.K. also has a register of people with significant control (PSC) over companies, which requires companies to disclose their beneficial owners2. The use of private companies and wire transfers could also be a sign of layering, a money laundering technique that involves moving funds through multiple accounts or entities to obscure their origin3.
References:
1: U.K. Government, Money Laundering Regulations 2017, Part 2: Customer Due Diligence, Section 5-6 2: U.
K. Government, People with significant control (PSC) register, Overview 3: ACAMS CAMS Certification Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 1: Risks and Methods of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, Page
19
by Nelson at May 26, 2026, 07:10 AM
0
0
0
10
Comments
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Report Comment
Commenting
You can sign-up / login (it's free).