Exam NSE5_FNC_AD_7.6 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion
Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE5_FNC_AD_7.6 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
Refer to the output below.

Examine the communication between a primary FortiNAC-F (192.168.10.10) and a secondary FortlNAC-F (192.168.10.110) configured as a 1+1 HA pair. What is the current state of the FortiNAC-F HA pair?

Examine the communication between a primary FortiNAC-F (192.168.10.10) and a secondary FortlNAC-F (192.168.10.110) configured as a 1+1 HA pair. What is the current state of the FortiNAC-F HA pair?
Suggested Answer: D Vote an answer
The correct answer is D . The log output shows the local IP address as 192.168.10.10 , which the question identifies as the primary FortiNAC-F server. In the same output, FortiNAC-F reports inControl true and controlServer true , which means the local primary server is currently the control server. The line showing communication to 192.168.10.110 returns Running - Not In Control , confirming that the secondary server is alive but is not the active controlling node.
This matches FortiNAC-F 1+1 HA behavior. The study guide describes a 1+1 HA pair as an active-passive deployment where one FortiNAC-F device is designated primary and the other secondary. Database and configuration synchronization keep the devices aligned, but only one server is in control at a time. If the primary fails, the secondary assumes control automatically; otherwise, the primary remains the active control server.
Option A is wrong because the secondary explicitly reports Not In Control . Option B is wrong because the output does not show database replication failure. Option C is wrong because failover is not in progress; the output shows a stable state where the primary is in control and the secondary is running as the passive node.
This matches FortiNAC-F 1+1 HA behavior. The study guide describes a 1+1 HA pair as an active-passive deployment where one FortiNAC-F device is designated primary and the other secondary. Database and configuration synchronization keep the devices aligned, but only one server is in control at a time. If the primary fails, the secondary assumes control automatically; otherwise, the primary remains the active control server.
Option A is wrong because the secondary explicitly reports Not In Control . Option B is wrong because the output does not show database replication failure. Option C is wrong because failover is not in progress; the output shows a stable state where the primary is in control and the secondary is running as the passive node.
by Martina at Oct 31, 2026, 05:02 AM
0
0
0
10
Comments
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Report Comment
Commenting
You can sign-up / login (it's free).