Exam ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion
Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Which of the following situations indicates that Printary identified consequences of risk scenarios? Refer to scenario 3.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Which of the following situations indicates that Printary identified consequences of risk scenarios? Refer to scenario 3.
Suggested Answer: B Vote an answer
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk management process involves identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks in a structured manner. Specifically, risk identification entails recognizing potential threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences to information assets. Once risks are identified, ISO/IEC 27005 emphasizes the importance of risk analysis, where risks are assessed in terms of their potential consequences and likelihood.
In the scenario, Printary followed this structured approach, aligning with the ISO/IEC 27005 framework. First, they identified the threats associated with the online payment system, which were categorized as user errors and data corruption. However, identification of threats alone does not equate to identifying the consequences of risk scenarios, as required by the risk analysis phase in ISO/IEC 27005.
The key to recognizing that Printary identified the consequences lies in the fact that they "used the list of potential incident scenarios and assessed their impact on the company's information security." This directly corresponds to ISO/IEC 27005's guidelines on risk analysis, where organizations must evaluate both the likelihood and the impact (consequences) of potential incidents on their assets. In other words, by assessing the impact of the incident scenarios, Printary is analyzing the consequences of the identified risks, which is a crucial step in the risk analysis process.
Option A refers to identifying a risk (user error leading to compromised data integrity and confidentiality), but this does not constitute a comprehensive analysis of the risk's consequences as per ISO/IEC 27005. Similarly, Option C highlights the identification of threats, but the threats themselves are not the consequences of risk scenarios.
Thus, Option B is the most accurate as it reflects Printary's alignment with ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines in assessing the potential consequences of risk scenarios by evaluating their impact on the company's information security.
In the scenario, Printary followed this structured approach, aligning with the ISO/IEC 27005 framework. First, they identified the threats associated with the online payment system, which were categorized as user errors and data corruption. However, identification of threats alone does not equate to identifying the consequences of risk scenarios, as required by the risk analysis phase in ISO/IEC 27005.
The key to recognizing that Printary identified the consequences lies in the fact that they "used the list of potential incident scenarios and assessed their impact on the company's information security." This directly corresponds to ISO/IEC 27005's guidelines on risk analysis, where organizations must evaluate both the likelihood and the impact (consequences) of potential incidents on their assets. In other words, by assessing the impact of the incident scenarios, Printary is analyzing the consequences of the identified risks, which is a crucial step in the risk analysis process.
Option A refers to identifying a risk (user error leading to compromised data integrity and confidentiality), but this does not constitute a comprehensive analysis of the risk's consequences as per ISO/IEC 27005. Similarly, Option C highlights the identification of threats, but the threats themselves are not the consequences of risk scenarios.
Thus, Option B is the most accurate as it reflects Printary's alignment with ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines in assessing the potential consequences of risk scenarios by evaluating their impact on the company's information security.
by Felix at Apr 29, 2025, 09:27 AM
0
0
0
10
Comments
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Report Comment
Commenting
You can sign-up / login (it's free).