Exam Agentforce-Specialist Topic 2 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Agentforce-Specialist exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 2
A company's support agent is inconsistently executing a mandatory fraud check action before processing refunds. In some conversations the fraud check fires, but in others the agent skips directly to issuing the refund. Upon review, an Agentforce Specialist recommends placing the instruction guideline with run
@actions.fraud_check followed by run @actions.process_refund.
What is the effect of this configuration change?

Suggested Answer: C Vote an answer

The correct answer is C. The problem is inconsistent LLM-selected behavior, so the fix must remove discretion from the reasoning engine for the mandatory fraud check. Salesforce explains that run inside reasoning.instructions is deterministic: the action executes immediately when the code path is reached.
Placing run @actions.fraud_check before run @actions.process_refund enforces the fraud check before the refund is processed. Option A describes exposing or suggesting an action to the LLM, which is not enough for mandatory compliance logic. Option B invents a side effect; deterministic action execution does not remove the agent's ability to use an empathetic tone in generated responses. The key distinction is forced procedural execution versus optional LLM tool selection.

by Bancroft at May 31, 2026, 10:14 AM

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Nick name: Submit Cancel
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

0
0
0
10