Exam 2V0-13.25 Topic 4 Question 72 Discussion
Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.25 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 4
Question #: 72
Topic #: 4
A company will be expanding their existing VCF environment for a new application. The existing VCF environment currently has a management domain and two separate VI workload domains with different hardware profiles.
The new application has the following requirements:
* The application will use significantly more memory than current workloads today.
* The application will have a limited number of licenses to run on hosts.
* Additional VCF and hardware costs have been approved for the application.
* The application will contain confidential customer information that requires isolation from other workloads.
What design recommendation should the administrator document?
The new application has the following requirements:
* The application will use significantly more memory than current workloads today.
* The application will have a limited number of licenses to run on hosts.
* Additional VCF and hardware costs have been approved for the application.
* The application will contain confidential customer information that requires isolation from other workloads.
What design recommendation should the administrator document?
Suggested Answer: B Vote an answer
The requirements demand memory capacity, licensing control, cost approval, and isolation.
Option B, "A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements," satisfies all: a new VI domain in VCF 5.2 isolates workloads (via separate NSX instance), uses approved funds for high-memory hardware, and allows licensing via DRS affinity rules within the domain.
Option A (new VCF instance) is overkill, duplicating management overhead.
Option C (management domain hardware) misuses the management domain's purpose.
Option D (expanding existing cluster) risks isolation breaches. B leverages VCF's workload domain architecture effectively.
Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide, Workload Domain Design; VMware vSphere 7.0 Documentation, DRS Affinity Rules.
Option B, "A new Workload domain with hardware supporting the memory requirements," satisfies all: a new VI domain in VCF 5.2 isolates workloads (via separate NSX instance), uses approved funds for high-memory hardware, and allows licensing via DRS affinity rules within the domain.
Option A (new VCF instance) is overkill, duplicating management overhead.
Option C (management domain hardware) misuses the management domain's purpose.
Option D (expanding existing cluster) risks isolation breaches. B leverages VCF's workload domain architecture effectively.
Reference: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide, Workload Domain Design; VMware vSphere 7.0 Documentation, DRS Affinity Rules.
by Josephine at May 18, 2026, 03:23 AM
0
0
0
10
Comments
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Report Comment
Commenting
You can sign-up / login (it's free).