Exam 3V0-24.25 Topic 3 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 3V0-24.25 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 3

A Platform Engineer is designing a multi-zone Supervisor architecture to support a high-availability requirement for a critical financial application. The design involves three vSphere Zones: Zone-A, Zone- B, and Zone-C.
The engineer needs to create a vSphere Namespace fin-app-ns that can tolerate the failure of any single zone.
Review the following proposed configuration snippet for the Namespace creation:
# Proposed Namespace Configuration Logic
Name: fin-app-ns
Placement:
Zones:
- Zone-A
- Zone-B
Storage Policies:
- gold-storage-policy (assigned to all zones)
Why is this proposed configuration insufficient to meet the "tolerate failure of any single zone" requirement for the Supervisor Control Plane and the workloads within this namespace? (Choose 2.)

A. A 3-zone Supervisor deployment is required to support the Supervisor Control Plane's high availability; restricting the Namespace to only two zones (A and B) prevents the Supervisor from placing control plane VMs in the third zone if one fails. B. The storage policy must be different for each zone to ensure replication. C. Kubernetes control planes typically require an odd number of members (e.g., 3) distributed across failure domains to maintain quorum (etcd) during a partition. Using only 2 zones risks split-brain scenarios. D. The configuration is actually valid; vSphere HA will handle the failover between Zone A and Zone E. vSphere Namespaces do not support multi-zone placement; they must be pinned to a single cluster.

Comments

0 Happy Clients

0 Shares

0 Demo Downloads

10 Years in Business