2025 Latest 100% Exam Passing Ratio - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Dumps PDF
Pass Exam With Full Sureness - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Dumps with 368 Questions
NEW QUESTION # 88
下列哪兩個短語適用於業務流程的計畫-執行-檢查-行動週期中的「檢查」？
- A. 管理變更
- B. 更新資訊安全策略
- C. 進行改進
- D. 重設目標
- E. 驗證訓練
- F. 審核流程
Answer: E,F
Explanation:
The two phrases that would apply to 'check' in the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle for a business process are:
* C. Verifying training
* F. Auditing processes
* C. This phrase applies to 'check' in the PDCA cycle because it involves measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of the training activities that were implemented in the 'do' phase. Training is an important aspect of information security awareness, education, and competence, which are required by clause 7.2 of ISO 27001:20221. Verifying training can help the organisation to assess whether the staff have acquired the necessary knowledge, skills, and behaviour to perform their roles and responsibilities in relation to information security. Verifying training can also help the organisation to identify any gaps or weaknesses in the training program and to plan for improvement actions.
* F. This phrase applies to 'check' in the PDCA cycle because it involves examining and reviewing the performance and conformity of the processes that were implemented in the 'do' phase. Auditing is a systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining objective evidence and evaluating it to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled2. Auditing processes can help the organisation to verify whether the information security objectives and requirements are met, whether the information security controls are effective and efficient, and whether the information security risks are adequately managed. Auditing processes can also help the organisation to identify any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement and to plan for corrective or preventive actions.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 7.2 2: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 3.2
NEW QUESTION # 89
起草審核結論後，審核組長的工作文件由認證機構選定的另一位審核員進行審核。這是可以接受的嗎？
- A. 不，只有審核組長審核每位審核員的工作文件
- B. 是的，審核組長的工作文件在得出審核結論後必須由另一位審核員審核
- C. 不可以，在得出審核結論前必須檢討審核組組長的工作
Answer: B
Explanation:
Yes, it is acceptable for the work documents of the audit team leader to be reviewed by another auditor after reaching audit conclusions. This is part of the quality control and assurance processes within the audit to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the audit conclusions.
NEW QUESTION # 90
AppFolk 是一家軟體開發公司，正在尋求 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。都包括在內。這是可以接受的嗎？
- A. 不，審核範圍應反映 ISMS 涵蓋的組織的所有部門
- B. 不，對被審核方所在工業部門不重要的部門可以排除在審核範圍之外
- C. 是的，審核和 ISMS 範圍不一定需要相同
Answer: A
Explanation:
No, the audit scope should reflect all of the organization's divisions that are covered by the ISMS. If the ISMS scope stated that it includes the whole company, the audit scope should align with this unless specifically justified and agreed upon by all stakeholders.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 4.3 (Determining the scope of the information security management system)
NEW QUESTION # 91
風險評估過程中滲透測試的目標是什麼？
- A. 辨識 ICT 保護方案中的潛在故障
- B. 進行徹底的程式碼審查
- C. 實體檢查硬體組件
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
Penetration testing (pen testing) is a simulated cyberattack used to assess security weaknesses in an ICT system.
B). Identifying failures in ICT protection schemes - Correct answer.
The goal of penetration testing is to find vulnerabilities in networks, applications, and systems before attackers can exploit them.
This aligns with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A Control A.8.16 (Monitoring Activities) and A.8.8 (Management of Technical Vulnerabilities).
A). Code reviews are not the primary goal of pen testing; static analysis tools are used for code security.
C). Physical inspections relate to hardware security audits, which are separate from penetration testing.
NEW QUESTION # 92
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 內部稽核師。
當 IT 經理找到您並要求您協助修改公司的適用性聲明時，您剛剛完成了組織的預定資訊安全審核。
IT 經理正在嘗試將基於 ISO/IEC 27001:2013 的適用性聲明更新為與 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 中的 4 個控制主題（組織控制、人員控制、實體控制、技術控制）一致的聲明。
IT 經理對控制權的重新分配感到滿意，但以下情況除外。他詢問您以下每個控制類別應出現在哪四個控制類別下。
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 93
下列哪兩個短語適用於與業務流程的計劃-實施-檢查-行動週期相關的「行動」？
- A. 測量目標
- B. 重設目標
- C. 計劃變更
- D. 審核流程
- E. 驗證訓練
- F. 實現改進
Answer: B,F
Explanation:
The Act phase of the PDCA cycle is where the organisation takes actions to improve its processes and performance based on the results of the Check phase. This may involve resetting objectives to make them more realistic, achievable or challenging, or implementing changes to address the root causes of problems and achieve the desired outcomes. The Act phase is also where the organisation monitors the effects of the actions taken and evaluates their effectiveness and efficiency. The Act phase is important because it enables the organisation to learn from its experience and continually improve its ISMS. References: What is 'Plan, Do, Check, Act'? A framework for continuous improvement, PDCA in ISO27001 - Free guide to learn | Dr. Erdal Ozkaya, PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor (page 12)
NEW QUESTION # 94
選擇最能描述如何進行資訊安全管理系統審核的選項：
- A. 應使用審核標準來評估客觀證據，以產生審核結果。然後，應建立審核報告並在末次會議上提交給審核組組長。
- B. 應使用審核標準來評估間接證據，以產生審核結果。
然後，應建立審核報告並在審核組會議上提交給審核組。 - C. 應使用審核方法來評估客觀證據，以得出審核結果。然後，應制定審核結論並在末次會議上提交給受審核方。
- D. 應使用審核方法來評估審核證據，以產生審核建議。
然後，應建立審核建議並在末次會議上提交給受審核方。 - E. 審計目標應用於評估審計證據，以得出審計結論。然後，應建立審核結果並在末次會議上提交給審核客戶。
- F. 審計目標應用於評估客觀證據，以得出審計結論。
然後，應建立審計建議並在管理審查時提交給最高管理層。
Answer: C
Explanation:
The option that best describes how Information Security Management System (ISMS) audits should be conducted, aligning with best practices and standards like ISO/IEC 27001:2022, is:
D: Audit methods should be used to assess objective evidence in order to generate audit findings. Then, the audit conclusion should be created and presented to the auditee at the closing meeting.
This option accurately reflects the audit process, emphasizing the use of systematic audit methods to assess objective evidence, which is crucial for impartiality and accuracy in auditing. Audit findings are the results derived from evaluating the objective evidence against the audit criteria. The conclusion, based on the audit findings, provides a comprehensive summary of the audit's outcomes, indicating whether the audited ISMS meets the established criteria. Presenting these conclusions to the auditee during the closing meeting ensures transparency and provides an opportunity for immediate clarification and discussion of the results and potential next steps.
NEW QUESTION # 95
下列哪兩項敘述是正確的？
- A. ISMS 的目的在於證明符合監管要求
- B. 認證 ISMS 的好處是獲得政府機構的合同
- C. ISMS 的目的在於應用風險管理流程來維護資訊安全
- D. 實施 ISMS 的好處主要來自於資訊安全風險的降低
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The benefits of implementing an ISMS are not limited to a reduction in information security risks, but also include improved business performance, customer satisfaction, legal compliance, and stakeholder confidence. The benefit of certifying an ISMS is not only to obtain contracts from governmental institutions, but also to demonstrate the organisation's commitment to information security to other potential customers, partners, and regulators. The purpose of an ISMS is to apply a risk management process for preserving information security, which means identifying, analysing, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and reviewing the information security risks that the organisation faces. The purpose of an ISMS is not to demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements, but rather to ensure that the organisation meets its own information security objectives and obligations.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) objectives and content from Quality.org and PECB ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements [Section 0.1] and [Section 1]
NEW QUESTION # 96
您是經驗豐富的審核團隊領導，指導審核員進行培訓。
您的團隊目前正在對代表外部客戶儲存資料的組織進行第三方監督審核。接受培訓的審核員的任務是審查適用性聲明 (SoA) 中列出的並在現場實施的組織控制措施。
從以下內容中選擇您希望接受培訓的審核員審查的四項控制措施。
- A. 電源線和資料線如何進入建築物
- B. 保密與保密協議
- C. 資訊資產清單的開發與維護
- D. 進出裝載區的通道
- E. 供應商協定中如何解決資訊安全問題
- F. 在組織內部以及向其他組織傳輸訊息的規則
- G. 組織的業務連續性安排
- H. 現場閉路電視和門禁系統的運行
Answer: B,C,E,F
Explanation:
According to the PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, the auditor in training should review the organisational controls that are related to the information security policy, the roles and responsibilities, the information classification, the information exchange, the supplier relationships, and the information asset management1. These controls are aligned with the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements for clauses
5, 7, 8.2, 8.3, and 8.42. The other controls (A, D, G, and H) are more relevant to the physical and environmental security, the communications security, or the business continuity management, which are not part of the organisational controls3. References: 1: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 42, section 5.2.32: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clauses 5, 7, 8.2, 8.3, and 8.43: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clauses 8.1, 8.5, and 8.6.
NEW QUESTION # 97
您是負責管理審核計劃並決定特定審核的審核團隊的規模和組成的人。選擇應考慮的兩個因素。
- A. 客戶關係
- B. 受審核方首選的持續時間
- C. 審核成本
- D. 審核範圍與標準
- E. 審核團隊實現審核目標所需的整體能力
- F. 審核組組長的資歷
Answer: D,E
Explanation:
The overall competence of the12:
The audit scope and criteria: The audit scope defines the extent and boundaries of the audit, such as the locations, processes, functions, and time period to be audited. The audit criteria are the set of policies, procedures, standards, or requirements used as a reference against which the audit evidence is compared. The audit scope and criteria determine the complexity and extent of the audit, and thus influence the number and expertise of the auditors needed to cover all the relevant aspects of the audit.
The overall competence of the audit team needed to achieve audit objectives: The audit team should have the appropriate knowledge, skills, and experience to conduct the audit effectively and efficiently, and to provide credible and reliable audit results. The audit team competence should include the following elements12:
Generic competence: The ability to apply the principles and methods of auditing, such as planning, conducting, reporting, and following up the audit, as well as the personal behaviour and attributes of the auditors, such as ethical conduct, fair presentation, professional care, independence, and impartiality.
Discipline and sector-specific competence: The ability to understand and apply the audit criteria and the relevant technical or industry aspects of the audited organization, such as the information security management system (ISMS) requirements, the information security risks and controls, the legal and regulatory obligations, the organizational context and culture, the processes and activities, the products and services, etc.
Audit team leader competence: The ability to manage the audit team and the audit process, such as coordinating the audit activities, communicating with the audit programme manager and the auditee, resolving any audit-related problems, ensuring the quality and consistency of the audit work and the audit report, etc.
The person responsible for managing the audit programme should not consider the following factors when deciding the size and composition of the audit team for a specific audit, as they are either irrelevant or inappropriate for the audit process12:
Customer relationships: The audit team should not be influenced by any personal or professional relationships with the auditee or other interested parties, as this may compromise the objectivity and impartiality of the audit. The audit team should avoid any conflicts of interest or self-interest that may affect the audit results or the audit decisions.
Seniority of the audit team leader: The audit team leader should be selected based on their competence and experience, not on their seniority or rank within the organization or the audit programme. The audit team leader should have the authority and responsibility to manage the audit team and the audit process, regardless of their seniority or position.
The cost of the audit: The cost of the audit should not be the primary factor for determining the size and composition of the audit team, as this may compromise the quality and effectiveness of the audit. The audit team should have sufficient resources and time to conduct the audit in accordance with the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, and to provide accurate and reliable audit results and recommendations.
The duration preferred by the auditee: The duration of the audit should be based on the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, and the availability and cooperation of the auditee, not on the preference or convenience of the auditee. The audit team should have enough time to conduct the audit in a thorough and systematic manner, and to collect and evaluate sufficient and relevant audit evidence.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, pages 19-20
NEW QUESTION # 98
情境 6：Sinvestment 是一家提供家庭保險、商業保險和人壽保險的保險公司。該公司成立於北卡羅來納州，但最近在其他地區進行了擴張，包括歐洲和非洲。
Sinvestment 致力於遵守適用於其行業的法律法規，並防止任何資訊安全事件。他們實施了基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的 ISMS 並申請了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。
認證機構指派兩名審核員進行審核。與Sinvestment簽訂保密協議後。他們開始了審計活動。首先，他們審查了標準要求的文件，包括 ISMS 範圍聲明、資訊安全政策和內部稽核報告。審查過程並不容易，因為儘管 Sinvestment 表示他們已製定文件程序，但並非所有文件都具有相同的格式。
隨後，審計小組對Sinvestment的高階主管進行了多次訪談，以了解他們在ISMS實施中的作用。第一階段審計的所有活動都是遠端進行的，除了根據 Sinvestment 的要求在現場進行的文件資訊審查之外。
在此階段，審計人員發現沒有與資訊安全培訓和意識計劃相關的文件。被問及時，Sinvestment代表表示，公司已為所有員工提供資訊安全培訓課程。第一階段審計讓審計團隊對 Sinvestment 的營運和 ISMS 有了整體了解。
第二階段審核在第一階段審核三週後進行。審計小組觀察到，行銷部門（未包含在審計範圍內）沒有適當的程序來控制員工的存取權限。由於控制員工的存取權限是ISO/IEC 27001的要求之一，並且已包含在公司的資訊安全政策中，因此該問題包含在審計報告中。此外，在第二階段審計中，審計小組觀察到Sinvestment沒有記錄使用者活動日誌。
該公司的程序規定“記錄用戶活動的日誌應保留並定期審查”，但該公司沒有提供任何執行該程序的證據。
在所有審核活動中，審核員透過觀察、訪談、文件化資訊審查、分析和技術驗證來收集資訊和證據。對第一階段和第二階段的所有審核結果進行了分析，審核小組決定發布積極的認證建議。
根據情境 6，在第一階段審核期間，審核員發現一些有關 ISMS 的文件具有不同的格式。在這種情況下，審計師該做什麼？
- A. 將此觀察結果記錄為第 2 階段應在審核期間驗證的問題
- B. 驗證記錄的資訊是否具有適當的格式並且符合公司的記錄程序，因為這是標準的要求
- C. 僅驗證是否記錄了標準要求的信息，而不考慮格式，因為這不是標準的要求
Answer: C
Explanation:
The auditor should verify if the information required by the standard is documented, without necessarily focusing on the format, as long as the content meets the requirements of the standard. ISO/IEC 27001 does not mandate a specific format for documentation, only that necessary information is appropriately documented, maintained, and controlled.
NEW QUESTION # 99
為什麼在初次接觸時要考慮重要性？
- A. 確定審核持續時間
- B. 定義最小化偵測風險的流程
- C. 合理保證審核能夠成功完成
Answer: C
Explanation:
Materiality should be considered during the initial contact to obtain reasonable assurance that the audit can be successfully completed. Determining materiality helps establish the threshold for the significance of audit findings, ensuring that the audit focuses on substantial issues that could impact the audit conclusions.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 100
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊領導者。受訓的審核員已與您聯繫，要求您澄清她可能需要進行的不同類型的審核。
將以下審核類型與描述相符。
要填寫表格，請按一下要填寫的空白部分，以便反白顯示“In fed”，然後從下面的選項中按一下適用的文字。或者，您可以將每個選項拖曳到相應的空白部分。
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 101
場景 8：苔絲
一個。 Malik 和 Michael 是一個由安全、合規以及業務規劃和策略領域的獨立且合格的專家組成的審計團隊。他們被指派到一家大型網頁設計公司Clastus進行認證審核。他們在進行審計時表現出了出色的職業道德，包括公正和客觀。這一次，Clastus 確信，如果獲得 ISO/IEC 27001 認證，他們將領先一步。
審計團隊負責人 Tessa 擁有審計專業知識，並且在 IT 相關問題、合規性和治理方面擁有非常成功的背景。馬利克擁有組織規劃和風險管理背景。他的專業知識依賴於對組織的安全控制及其風險承受能力的綜合和分析水平，以準確描述組織內部的風險水平 另一方面，Michael 是通過遵循嚴格的標準化程序進行控制評估的實際安全性的專家。
在執行所需的審計活動後，泰莎發起了一次審計團隊會議，他們分析了邁克爾的一項發現，以客觀、準確地就該問題做出決定。 Michael 遇到的問題是組織日常運作中的一個小問題，他認為這是由組織的一名 IT 技術人員造成的，因此，Tessa 會見了高層管理人員，並在他們詢問了責任人姓名後，告訴他們誰應該對這一問題負責，為了方便澄清和理解，Tessa 在審核的最後一天召開了結束會議。在這次會議上，她向 Clastus 管理層報告了發現的不符合情況。然而，Tessa 收到建議，避免在 Clastus 認證審核的審核報告中提供不必要的證據，確保報告保持簡潔並專注於關鍵發現。
根據審查的證據，審核小組起草了審核結論，並決定在授予認證之前必須對該組織的兩個領域進行審核。這些決定後來被提交給被審計方，但被審計方不接受調查結果並提議提供更多資訊。儘管受審計方提出了意見，但審計員已經決定接受認證建議，因此沒有接受補充資訊。被審計單位的高階主管堅持審計結論並不代表事實，但審計小組仍堅持他們的決定。
根據上述情景，回答以下問題：
建議 Tessa 避免在 Clastus 認證審核的審核報告中提供不必要的證據。推薦這個嗎？
- A. 是的，為了簡化報告以便於更好地理解
- B. 否，為了確保考慮並處理所有相關證據
- C. 是的，以避免包含可能危及審計機密性的信息
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
C . Correct answer:
ISO 19011:2018 requires audit reports to include all relevant evidence supporting audit conclusions.
Omitting evidence for conciseness undermines transparency and credibility.
A . Incorrect:
Audit confidentiality is protected through controlled access, not by omitting evidence.
B . Incorrect:
Clarity is important, but not at the expense of completeness.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.7 (Audit Reporting Best Practices)
NEW QUESTION # 102
場景 4：Branding 是一家行銷公司，與美國一些最著名的公司合作。降低內部成本。兩年多來，Branding 已將軟體開發和 IT 幫助台營運外包給 Techvology。技術學。配備必要的專業知識，管理品牌的軟體、網路和硬體需求。 Branding 已實施資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS) 並獲得了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證，表明其致力於維護高標準的資訊安全。它積極對技術進行審計，以確保其外包業務的安全性符合 ISO/IEC 27001 認證要求。
在上次審計期間。品牌的審計團隊定義了要審計的流程和審計計畫。他們採用了基於證據的方法，特別是考慮到 Techvology 在過去一年中報告的兩起資訊安全事件。所有方面。
此外，審計也對Techvology用於管理其外包業務和其他組織的治理流程進行了嚴格的評估。此步驟對於品牌推廣至關重要，可以驗證是否有適當的控制和監督機制來減輕與外包安排相關的潛在風險。
審計員對 Techvology 各級人員進行了採訪，並分析了事件解決記錄。此外，Techvology 還提供了記錄作為證據，證明他們為員工開展了事件管理意識會議。根據收集到的信息，他們預測這兩起資訊安全事件都是由人員不稱職造成的。因此，審計人員要求查看涉事員工的人事檔案，以審查其能力的證據，例如相關經驗、證書和參與培訓的記錄。
Branding 的審計員對所獲得的證據的有效性進行了嚴格評估，並對可能與收到的記錄資訊的可靠性相矛盾或質疑的證據保持警惕。在對 Techvology 進行審計期間，審計員堅持這種方法，嚴格評估事件解決記錄，並對不同級別和職能的員工進行徹底的訪談。他們不只把 Techvology 代表的話當作事實；相反，他們尋求具體的證據來支持代表們對事件管理流程的主張。
根據上述情景，回答以下問題：
場景 4 的最後一段解釋了哪一項審計原則？
- A. 基於風險的方法
- B. 專業懷疑論
- C. 公平展示
Answer: B
Explanation:
Professional skepticism involves challenging evidence, verifying claims, and avoiding assumptions.
The auditors critically assessed the validity of evidence, ensuring claims made by Techvology were backed by concrete proof.
A . Incorrect:
Risk-based auditing prioritizes high-risk areas, but the paragraph focuses on verifying claims and evidence.
B . Incorrect:
Fair presentation ensures accurate reporting of findings, but the paragraph focuses on questioning evidence, not reporting.
Relevant Standard Reference:
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
NEW QUESTION # 103
在與管理認證機構審核計畫的個人進行討論時，客戶組織的管理系統代表會要求指定特定審核員來進行認證審核。選擇以下選項中的兩個來了解管理審核計劃的個人應如何應對。
- A. 建議請求認證機構管理層允許該請求
- B. 告知管理系統代表，審核團隊的選擇是審核專案經理需要根據可用資源做出的決定
- C. 通知管理系統代表他的請求可以被接受
- D. 建議管理系統代表選擇其他認證機構
- E. 表明他的請求將被考慮，但可能不會被接受
Answer: B,E
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, a certification body should ensure that its auditors are competent, impartial, and independent from the auditee organization2. Therefore, if a Management System Representative of a client organization asks for a specific auditor for the certification audit, the individual(s) managing the audit programme should respond in a way that does not compromise these principles or create any conflict of interest or undue influence2. Two possible ways to respond are to state that his request will be considered but may not be taken up, as there may be other factors that affect the auditor selection process; or to advise him that the audit team selection is a decision that the audit programme manager needs to make based on the resources available, such as auditor availability, competence, location, etc2. The other options are not suitable ways to respond in this situation. For example, advising him that his request can be accepted may raise doubts about the objectivity and credibility of the auditor and the certification body; suggesting that he chooses another certification body may imply that his request is unreasonable or unethical; and suggesting asking the certification body management to permit his request may suggest that there is room for negotiation or manipulation in auditor selection2. References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 104
場景 7：Lawsy 是一家領先的律師事務所，在新澤西州和紐約市設有辦公室。它擁有 50 多名律師，為商業法、智慧財產權、銀行和金融服務領域的客戶提供完善的法律服務。他們相信，由於他們致力於實施資訊安全最佳實踐並跟上技術發展的步伐，他們在市場上佔據了有利的地位。
Lawsy 已經嚴格實施、評估和進行 ISMS 內部審核兩年了。
現在，他們已向知名且值得信賴的認證機構ISMA申請ISO/IEC 27001認證。
在第一階段審核期間，審核小組審查了實施過程中所建立的所有 ISMS 文件。
他們還審查和評估了管理審查和內部審計的記錄。
Lawsy 提交了證據記錄，表明在必要時對不合格項採取了糾正措施，因此審核組約談了內部審核員。訪談透過提供對內部稽核計畫和程序的詳細了解，驗證了內部稽核的充分性和頻率。
審計小組繼續驗證戰略文件，包括資訊安全政策和風險評估標準。在資訊安全政策審查期間，團隊注意到描述治理框架（即資訊安全政策）的記錄資訊與程序之間存在不一致。
儘管允許員工將筆記型電腦帶到工作場所之外，但 Lawsy 並沒有製定有關在這種情況下使用筆記型電腦的程序。此政策僅提供有關筆記型電腦使用的一般資訊。該公司依靠員工的常識來保護筆記型電腦中儲存的資訊的機密性和完整性。該問題已記錄在第一階段審計報告中。
完成第一階段審核後，審核組長準備了審核計劃，其中闡述了審核目標、範圍、標準和程序。
在第二階段審核期間，審核小組約談了資安經理，資安經理起草了資訊安全政策。他透過指出 Lawsy 每三個月舉辦一次強制性資訊安全培訓和意識課程來證明第一階段中確定的問題的合理性。
面談後，審核小組檢查了 15 份員工培訓記錄（共 50 份），得出的結論是 Lawsy 符合 ISO/IEC 27001 有關培訓和意識的要求。為了支持這個結論，他們影印了檢查過的員工訓練記錄。
根據上述場景，回答以下問題：
根據情境 7，Lawsy 在開始第二階段審核之前該做什麼？
- A. 與認證機構審核並確認審核計劃
- B. 定義可以組合哪些審核測試計畫來驗證合規性
- C. 第一階段審核的審核結果進行品質審核
Answer: A
Explanation:
Prior to the initiation of stage 2 audit, Lawsy should review and confirm the audit plan with the certification body. This ensures that both parties agree on the objectives, scope, and procedures for the stage 2 audit, thus aligning expectations and facilitating a smoother audit process.
References: ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems
NEW QUESTION # 105
對於組織和利害關係人來說，第三方認可的 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 資訊安全管理系統認證有哪兩個選項的好處？
- A. 第三方認可的認證確保組織的 IT 系統免受外部幹擾
- B. 第三方認可的認證表示組織符合相關方期望的法律和法規要求
- C. 第三方認可的認證表示組織的管理系統已維護且有效
- D. 第三方認可的認證表示組織的 ICT 產品受到保護並獲得認證
- E. 第三方認可的認證顯示該組織的管理系統採用了系統的資訊安全方法
- F. 第三方認可的認證確保組織獲得更多客戶
Answer: C,E
Explanation:
Third-party accredited certification of information security management systems to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 provides assurance to organisations and interested parties that the organisation's management system is maintained and effective, meaning that it conforms to the requirements of the standard, meets the organisation' s objectives and policies, and addresses the risks and opportunities related to information security. Third-party accredited certification also demonstrates that the organisation's management system adopted a systematic approach to information security, meaning that it follows the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, applies the risk-based thinking principle, and considers the context and needs of the organisation and its stakeholders
NEW QUESTION # 106
場景 3：Rebuildy 是一家位於泰國曼谷的建築公司，專門從事住宅建築的設計、建造和維護。為了確保敏感專案資料和客戶資訊的安全，Rebuildy 決定實施基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS)。
ISMS 實施成果如下
* 資訊安全是透過應用一系列安全控制和製定政策、流程和程序來實現的。
* 安全控制是根據風險評估實施的，旨在消除風險或將風險降低到可接受的水平。
* 所有流程均基於計劃-執行-檢查-行動 (PDCA) 模型確保 ISMS 的持續改進。
* 資訊安全政策是根據最佳安全實務起草的安全手冊的一部分，因此，它不是一份獨立的文件。
* 資訊安全角色和職責已在每位員工的職位說明中明確說明
* 資訊安全管理系統的管理評審是依照計畫的時間間隔進行的。
Rebuildy 在經歷了兩次中期管理評審和一次年度內部審計後申請了認證。該前員工向審計團隊成員 Electra 提交了書面證據，Rebuildy 的主要客戶 Electra 也提交了有關相同問題的證據，審計員決定保留這份證據，而不是前員工的證據。審計團隊成員一直與 Electra 保持聯繫，直至審計完成，討論審計期間發現的不符合。伊萊克特拉提供了額外的證據來支持這些發現。
在審核開始時，審核小組對公司高階主管進行了訪談，討論了高階主管對 ISMS 實施的承諾等事項。從這些討論中獲得的證據都記錄在書面確認書中，用於確定 Rebuildy 是否符合 ISO/IEC 27001 的幾個條款。其中，發現以下不符合：
* 在公司的財務報告系統中偵測到了不當的使用者存取控制設定實例。
* 尚未建立獨立的資訊安全政策。相反，該公司使用根據最佳安全實踐起草的安全手冊。
在收到審計團隊的這些文件後，團隊負責人會見了 Rebuildy 的高層管理層，介紹了審計結果。審計小組報告了與財務報告系統和缺乏獨立資訊安全政策有關的調查結果。高階主管對調查結果表示不滿，並認為審計組長的行為不專業，暗示他們可能會要求更換組長。迫於壓力，審計組長決定與高階主管合作，淡化所發現的不符合項的重要性。因此，審計團隊負責人調整了報告以呈現更有利的觀點，從而歪曲了 Rebuildy 合規問題的真實程度。
根據上述情景，回答以下問題：
根據情境 3 的最後一段，審計團隊負責人犯了什麼錯誤？
- A. 嚴重疏忽
- B. 一般疏忽
- C. 詐欺
Answer: C
Explanation:
The audit team leader knowingly falsified the audit report to downplay nonconformities.
Fraud involves intentional deception or misrepresentation of information, making this a fraudulent act.
A: Ordinary negligence (Incorrect):
Ordinary negligence is a failure to exercise reasonable care, but this case involved intentional misconduct.
B: Gross negligence (Incorrect):
Gross negligence is extreme carelessness but does not involve deliberate misrepresentation.
Relevant Standard Reference:
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
NEW QUESTION # 107
為 ISMS 中的資訊安全風險評估流程選擇正確的順序。
要完成序列，請按一下要完成的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後從下面的選項中按一下適用的文字。或者，您可以將選項拖曳到適當的空白處
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 108
......
Verified ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN dumps Q&As - 100% Pass from FreeCram: https://www.freecram.com/PECB-certification/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-exam-dumps.html
Pass ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed 2025 Dumps: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1j_BZuGZV0rfDWElSOrQFnlyD9uJ1ze1R